Huang Dachuan: to radicalization and oligarchy is the key to the reform of (turn) <> Article: San
three of luck too, only to China's reform and suppress the radical oligarchs of <> in China From 1978 to this year's reform and opening up policy three decades has been the whole, these three years of rapid economic development both in China, there are many problems, how to look at the process of China's reform achievements and problems? If I have mentioned with the previous conservative and radical community will be presented in the historical experience of the general law to find out some clues of .1978 years ago is a standard radical social reform and opening up the essence is to reverse the process of radical social, though In the three years of Chinese society there are still many radical elements, but an open society, inclusive, of the conservative nature of traditional culture, as well as civilians, the free market economy, the implementation of selective (although our market is far from perfect) These distinctive characteristics of a society which have substantially increased, which is the root cause of social reform and the driving force for progress. how should we look at three decades of reform appears to be the problem? is actually caused by two aspects, first, the old problems, reform Some do not adapt to the process of the old radical conservative elements of social existence, which is the legacy of previous social problems have not resolved; the second is a new problem is a common problem of social conservative issues, namely the firms with negative effects in society have not been effectively curb. In the great debate of reform, there are two views one can only see the negative effects of oligarchs preferred to return to the planned economy era, and second, only to see the shortcomings of the neglect of former oligarchs society has not been effectively curbed hazards, I think these two views are not comprehensive enough to solve China's current problems can only be from two aspects, one is to maintain the conservative state of society continue to remove the radical elements in society that not only walked back walk, the second is the effective curb the oligarchs and curb not kill, should improve the rules of the game from the start, so that the civilian population and the elite can be balanced in a state of relatively fair game. My view is conservative liberal tendencies, but they do not agree to be called as only the strong stronger the weak weaker, it is the way to the economic crisis, social crisis or the risk of the road. At the same time, it should be noted that we can not go back can not go past the elite tried to stifle the road, and that dangerous. continue to advance the cause of China's reform and the key will only be two-pronged approach while addressing the new and old contradictions, not only going to radicalization, but also to prevent the conservative society of the elite extreme. proverb, death, a place on the chaos may ensure the of the formation is the key. to study the well-known social justice and well-known scholar John Rawls view of China's reform policy worthy of the designer should learn from Rawls that They have the fewest rights, opportunities, income and wealth, social inequality, embodied most strongly in them. a just social system should be through a variety of institutional arrangements to improve the 'most disadvantaged' position, increase their hope to narrow their gap with others. Thus, if a social arrangement for some reason have some kind of inequality, then it only helps to maximize the interests of the most disadvantaged groups, it order is just. begin to explore in-depth reform of China's some directional issues. <> China is a large agricultural country, with many of the rural population, many of China's history of social turmoil in the process of events is closely with the farmers before the land clearance, land China's social stability issues are also a decisive factor in whether or not the Land of the contract .1978 become an opportunity to start reform, reform of the beginning of the lowest class of farmers originally really benefited from the income of farmers increased substantially. a sweet period the gradual exposure of rural issues and has become increasingly prominent, the land issue has become the most unstable rural society as a whole one of the factors. First, the grassroots government Also free is the national agricultural subsidies to farmers. rural arbitrary collection of fees from the main contradiction of the farmers have shifted to the right to use land expropriation, to grassroots level on behalf of the Government or the collective use of force at very low prices farmers received land use rights, and then investment or re-construction of high-priced resale house property sale profits to the city residents. the law does not empower the farmers can not sell land use rights only the rights of farmers when land acquisition is almost no way. This approach social harm is obvious, for countries, agricultural land is a lot of development, the country's food security can not be effectively protected. For the peasants, there is no land, there is no all, many people have become a society ; blind Many people suggested that the ownership of the land to the peasants, the farmers themselves have the right not to sell land to farmers to solve the illegal acquisition of land for private levy issue. This is a fundamental solution, but there are other complementary measures must be introduced at the same time, otherwise it may bring other equally dangerous to other social problems. In Chinese history, if the land is privately owned property, when a society of farmers of various tax burden too heavy too high, farmers will have no benefit farming to be made, the lower middle class farmers to sell their land can only be willing to pay for the land of the landlord or the bureaucracy, the end result of the annexation of land is a large number of landless peasants form a real problem is that the ownership of the land to the peasants, be sure to use legislation to strictly land use, agricultural land is not free to the construction of agricultural land or commercial residential zone, and then have to increase agricultural subsidies, and enable the farmers farming profitable, but also through preferential policies to encourage farmers to the desert wasteland and grass planting. You can also encourage farmers to consider a voluntary basis according to their land shares, that is, job opportunities for farmers and allow farmers to use land shares dividends, engage in agricultural enterprises group operation (also strict land-use purpose, if the operation of agricultural enterprises can not be satisfied to allow the peasants farmers in a certain period of voluntary divestment). resolve the land question is actually a farmer as previously mentioned in the conservative principle, to prevent radical of (not recycled land, but also the ownership of land to the peasants), put an end to oligarchy of (prevention of land a large number of mergers) two-pronged approach, which is commonly used in today's civilized country agricultural policies, can be for our use. <> contract law serious social conflicts pressure increases; Labor and Social Security to strengthen the business overwhelmed, resulting in a large number of foreign bankruptcy or withdrawal of China, will increase unemployment and social instability will therefore also increase. caused this dilemma can only be that our economic structure is extremely unreasonable, after all, developed countries than foreign or even not as good as our country's labor welfare state are better than China, is increasingly integrated into the world economy of China in the process of gradual integration with the international , the labor system, which is an integral part of integration. To solve this problem can only start from two aspects, namely enhancing the sense of innovation of Chinese enterprises, we can not always rely on imitation of others, and low-cost labor advantage to international competition, innovation is the soul of social development, but also have access to high-yield business the best way to rules of the game of international economic integration is also possible to protect this innovation, this is the final solution to the plight of the most important factor of labor. But innovation requires a relaxed atmosphere and environment of academic freedom, innovation is a key factor in the human factor can not be separated, ten trees takes a hundred years, can not be bound to that solution can only thirst of distant water. the immediate plight of labor can only start from changing the economic structure, more of our labor rights as the game between employers and employees, in fact, there is an important addition to the labor market in which the body plays an important role, that is, government, employers and labor compared to the strong, but the government is weak compared to many of the government in the interests of employers and employees are stakeholders in the game, every year China's GDP accounted for the proportion of total tax revenue increased year by year, the Government should give up some benefits to both employers and employees to enable them to better coordination between each other. In its present form, the Chinese government not only to reduce administrative costs but also improve administrative efficiency, it is necessary to reduce the tax revenue of dividends but also efforts to increase social welfare spending and use efficiency, which must not be lost is a difficult task must be completed .<><> Conclusion: This article is almost no mention of an important concept that people often talks about - The concept has been mentioned but'd easily lead to ambiguity, such as a democratic people will mention that tyranny of the majority, the minority subordinate to the majority of people, that most people through the 'democratic process' to deprive the minority of property and even lives up democracy ? Although you can say that democracy is the majority to the minority to obey, and do not forget the other people should respect the principle of majority minority. no one has the right words to explain the hegemony language, some people say that tyranny of the majority is one of the forms of democracy, who also no way. In order to minimize the concept of ambiguity, instead of democracy is . On the other hand, we seem to know there are errors of democracy, democracy should not be an end, but means a kind of social development to help us better means. to say the least, is the re-authoritarian society has said before democratic alternative to the composition of words, but the ingredients are big or small, can not achieve a satisfactory level won `t be a different story. Since my thoughts since becoming a conservative, but also often think about democracy, the other topic, including my former Many people often say, including , if you can recognize and suppress the radical oligarchs to the importance and necessity of democracy (or a democracy, I mentioned that place beyond words) as a means of nature will be applied to the problems dealt with.
No comments:
Post a Comment